ChatGPT vs. Google Bard Statistics – Which is Better? (2025)

Introduction

ChatGPT vs. Google Bard Statistics – Which is Better?: ChatGPT and Google Bard are two of the most powerful AI chatbots today, created by top tech companies, OpenAI and Google. As more industries start using AI tools, both chatbots are improving at giving accurate, useful, and human-like answers.

By looking at their features, number of users, and usage statistics, we can clearly understand which is more popular and performs better. This Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics – Which is Better?” article breaks down the main numbers and highlights to help you see which chatbot is the top choice in 2025.

Editor’s Choice

• In January 2023, Microsoft said it would put USD 10 billion into OpenAI, the company that made ChatGPT. This is the biggest money move to compete with Google in search since Bing started 13 years ago.
• OpenAI shared that ChatGPT hit 1 million users just 5 days after it launched in November 2023.
• Bard’s use varies widely across different age groups. The largest group of users is between 25 and 34 years old, making up 34.20% of Bard’s users.
• Google introduced Bard on February 6, 2023. Currently, only special “trusted testers” can try it, but it will soon be open to everyone.
• On February 7, 2023, Microsoft announced that its Edge browser and Bing search engine now have AI built in.
• Google answered on February 8, 2023, with an event in Paris, sharing more about how they are adding AI to search.

Differences Between Google Bard and ChatGPT

Technical Differences Between ChatGPT and Google Bard

• Google Bard is trained using Infiniset, a special dataset owned by Google. This data includes a wide range of content, such as Common Crawl, Wikipedia, science articles, math problems, and multiple human and programming languages.
• At first, Bard used the Palm 2 model, which was designed to improve its chatting and coding skills. But in 2025, Google updated Bard to the Gemini 1.5 model. This version can handle more advanced tasks and is directly linked to Google Search, letting Bard provide real-time answers from the Internet.
• One of Bard’s key strengths is its live internet access, which means users always get the latest updates.
• On the other hand, ChatGPT is trained using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). It uses information from public sources like Common Crawl, Wikipedia, some licensed data, and user-provided input. However, OpenAI hasn’t shared all the details about this training data.
• In the chart below, we will compare the technical aspects of Google Gemini and Chat GPT:

• The free version of ChatGPT runs on GPT-3.5, which only knows information available up to 2021; it doesn’t understand anything that happened after that. If you subscribe to the paid plan, you get access to GPT-4, which is smarter and based on newer data, but it still can’t access live internet content.
• ChatGPT is great for creating detailed conversations and content. It also remembers user preferences and past chats, personalising the experience over time.
• But Bard doesn’t have memory like that. It can only track what’s said in a single session—once the chat ends, it forgets everything.
• Thanks to its live internet access, Bard is better for real-time and updated answers.
• ChatGPT is stronger for creative tasks and deep conversations, especially since it remembers past chats if you’re a paid user.

ChatGPT Users Statistics

• As per February 2025 data by SEMrush, ChatGPT ranks 8th in the world in terms of the most viewed websites.
• Exploding topics highlighted in its report using “Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics – Which is Better?”, figures that Chatgpt has 400 million weekly users.
• ChatGPT plans to hit 1 billion users by the end of 2025.

• According to “Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics—Which is Better?” Demand Sage revealed that over 45% of users are under 24.

According to One2Target data, ChatGPT users can also be grouped by lifestyle and income:

• 21% live in homes with 3 to 4 family members
• 4% have full-time jobs
• 03% come from low-income households

(Source: explodingtopics.com)

• OpenAI shared that ChatGPT hit 1 million users just 5 days after it launched in November 2023.
• Based on “Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics—Which is Better?” Demand Sage revealed that 64.32% of people using ChatGPT are men, while 35.68% are women.
• The following table shows how ChatGPT’s monthly visits progressed over time:

• Based on “Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics—Which is Better?” Demand Sage revealed that ChatGPT.com receives about 5.2 billion visits every month.
• Out of those, nearly 601.5 million are from different individual users.
• The website’s bounce rate is 38.70%, meaning that around 39% of people leave after looking at just one page.
• On average, each user checks around 2.77 pages during a visit.
• Visitors usually spend 8 minutes and 13 seconds on the site per session.

Google Bard Users Statistics

• In January 2025, Gemini (previously called Google Bard) got about 267.6 million visits, a 2.38% increase from December 2024.
• The United States had the largest share of this traffic, 15.99%, followed by India, 10.17%, and Indonesia, 5.01%.

(Source: grabon.in)

• The following table shows the Google Bard total traffic share statistics by different countries:

• Visitors to Google Gemini usually stay on the site for about 4 minutes and 29 seconds each visit.
• Although there’s no official number yet, Gemini is expected to reach 1 billion users by the end of 2025.
• On average, users view around 3.14 pages per session, and the platform’s bounce rate is about 35.03%—roughly 35% of people leave the site after seeing just one page.
• Most of Gemini’s visitors come from direct traffic (72.93%), while organic search—like results from search engines make up about 17.74% of its visitors.

ChatGPT User Age Demographics Statistics

(Source: scoop.market.us)

• In 2023, ChatGPT users came from many different age ranges. The largest group is people aged 25 to 34, about 34.82% of all users.
• Next is the group aged 18 to 24, which makes up 27.7% of users.
• 28% of users are between 35 and 44 years old, while users aged 45 to 54 represent 10.11%.
• People aged 55 to 64 account for 5.67% of users, and the oldest group, 65 and older, makes up 3.42%.
• This shows that ChatGPT attracts a wide variety of age groups, meaning it’s useful and easy for people of different ages.

Google Bard Demographics Statistics

(Source: scoop.market.us)

• Bard’s use varies widely across different age groups. The largest group of users is between 25 and 34 years old, making up 34.20% of Bard’s users.
• The next biggest group is people aged 18 to 24, representing 22.21% of users.
• Users between 35 and 44 comprise 19.68%, while those aged 45 to 54 account for 12.86%.
• Bard has fewer users in older age groups: 7.03% are between 55 and 64 years old, and 4.02% are 65 or older.
• This age breakdown gives helpful information about Bard’s user community.

Open AI Model Statistics

• Here’s a breakdown of key OpenAI models:

Google Gemini Statistics by Model

#1. Google Gemini comes in two main versions: Gemini 1.0 and Gemini 2.0.

• Gemini 2.0 is a major upgrade from Gemini 1.0. It offers better features like handling more types of content, smarter AI tools, and deeper connections with Google products. Here’s how they compare:

#2. Handling Multiple Media Types

• Gemini 1.0: Mostly works with text. It has limited ability to handle pictures or sound.
• Gemini 2.0: Can understand and respond to images and audio, making it more useful and interactive.

#3. AI That Acts on Its Own

• Gemini 1.0: Can write and understand text, but can’t complete tasks alone.
• Gemini 2.0: Has smart AI agents that can finish tasks without needing help from users.

#4. Works with Google Services

• Gemini 1.0: Only has basic connections with Google tools.
• Gemini 2.0: Is fully connected to Google Search, Maps, and Workspace apps like Docs and Sheets.

#5. Speed and Efficiency

• Gemini 1.0: Works at a regular pace, good for simple requests.
• Gemini 2.0: Runs faster, responds quicker, and handles more demanding tasks better.

#6. New and Advanced Features

• Gemini 1.0: Offers only basic tools with not much extra.
• Gemini 2.0 introduces experimental options like 2.0 Flash Thinking and 2.0 Pro, which are designed for deep thinking and solving hard problems.

ChatGPT vs Google Bard Performance Statistics

• Image

• Video

• Audio

Conversion Retention Ability Statistics

• A key difference between ChatGPT and Google Bard (now Gemini) is how they handle earlier parts of a conversation.
• ChatGPT can keep up to 3,000 words from past chats, but it doesn’t fully use that info when replying. This means it might forget what was said before, making it harder to stay on topic or give the right answer as the chat continues.
• In comparison, Google Bard is much better at remembering what was discussed earlier. It uses that history to adjust its replies, making them more accurate and keeping the conversation smooth over time.
• So, if you want better memory and follow-up in a chat, Bard does a better job than ChatGPT.

Google Gemini vs ChatGPT Finance Statistics

• The following table shows us the financial aspects of Google Bard and ChatGPT:

• Experts at UBS estimated that every search that triggers Google’s Gemini AI adds an extra cost between USD0.003 and USD0.028 to the regular search cost, which was around USD0.003 per query as of March 2023.
• A separate report from SemiAnalysis, published on February 17, 2023, stated that OpenAI spends about USD0.0036 for each question asked through ChatGPT.
• Subscription Options
• Both ChatGPT and Google Gemini are available for free. However, ChatGPT also has a Plus plan for USD20/month, which gives users access to premium tools like GPT-4, DALL-E, and other added benefits.
• Currently, Google Gemini does not offer any paid subscription plans.

Conclusion

To sum it up, ChatGPT and Google Bard (now called Gemini) have strong points, depending on what you need. ChatGPT is great for detailed writing, creative tasks, and remembering your past chats, especially if you’re using the GPT-4 version, which comes with the USD20/month Plus plan. On the flip side, Gemini gives you real-time access to the Internet, works well with Google tools like Search and Maps, and is better at showing up-to-date info.

While ChatGPT has more users and higher engagement, Gemini is catching up fast with steady growth and improvements. Ultimately, ChatGPT is better for deep conversations and content creation, while Gemini is the go-to for fresh, live information and faster responses. Through this article, we have shed enough light on “Chatgpt vs. Google Bard Statistics – Which is Better?”.